![]() ![]() The comments offered the most clarity yet on Johnson's position on the Respect for Marriage Act as a bipartisan group of senators led by Wisconsin Democrat Tammy Baldwin work to win enough Republican support to pass the measure, which could see a vote on the Senate floor as soon as this month.īaldwin and Maine Republican Sen. Tammy Baldwin is trying to get Republican support Never felt that we needed to do anything other than that." Wisconsin Sen. "So just to get them off my backs, I wrote a press release, and I said I always supported civil unions. “So you just get hounded on this crap, right?" Johnson said. Johnson also bemoaned reporters' questions about whether he would support the bill. (Stare decisis refers to legal precedent.) "But that’s a different issue as to whether or not the Supreme Court would overturn it. "Because Justice Thomas is probably right that it was wrongly decided," Johnson added. Stare decisis is really powerful when, if the Supreme Court were to overrule a previous decision, even if it’s wrongly decided - that’s kind of how this all came up." Wade needed to be overturned to protect people in the future. In his comments in Hartford, Johnson said Thomas was "probably right" that the Obergefell decision was wrong. Hodges decision that gave same-sex couples the right to marry. Still, Democrats see the measure as pertinent after Justice Clarence Thomas wrote that the court should "reconsider" its previous due process precedents, including the 2015 Obergefell v. Wade, which protected the right to abortion, he's said, will not impact same-sex marriage. The Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v. ![]() ![]() Johnson has maintained that he does not think a bill codifying same-sex marriage is necessary. Hodges ruling on same-sex marriage 'wrongly decided' "But at the same time I don’t want to see millions of lives disrupted either. “I would not support it in its current state," Johnson said at a Common Sense Citizens of Washington County meeting Thursday after reiterating his concerns about religious liberties, according to a recording obtained by the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. He put out his July statement saying he wouldn't oppose the legislation, he said, to get the press "off my backs." Johnson in recent weeks has noted he " never said" he would support the bill and indicated he has reservations over how the legislation could impact religious protections.īut speaking at a public meeting in Hartford last week, the Oshkosh Republican was definitive - saying he would not support the Respect for Marriage Act in its current form and indicating he believes the Supreme Court case giving same-sex couples the right to marry was "wrongly decided." Ron Johnson's vote on a bill to codify same-sex marriage has been in question since the Wisconsin Republican initially said he saw "no reason to oppose" the legislation. Wade could mean for rights like contraception, gay marriage ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |